5 best open source rtsp server projects.

We have collection of more than 1 Million open source products ranging from Enterprise product to small libraries in all platforms. We aggregate information from all open source repositories. Search and find the best for your needs. Check out projects section.

Displaying 1 to 5 from 5 results

libstreaming - A solution for streaming H.264, H.263, AMR, AAC using RTP on Android

Java

libstreaming is an API that allows you, with only a few lines of code, to stream the camera and/or microphone of an android powered device using RTP over UDP.

android h264 rtsp-server aac amr mediarecorder mediarecorder-api rtp mediacodec

v4l2rtspserver - RTSP Server for V4L2 device capture supporting HEVC/H264/JPEG/VP8/VP9

RTSP Server for V4L2 device capture supporting HEVC/H264/JPEG/VP8/VP9

rtsp-server v4l2 rtsp c-plus-plus hls v4l2-device

rtsp-simple-server - ready-to-use server and proxy that allows to read, publish and proxy video and audio streams with RTSP, RTMP, HLS

rtsp-simple-server is a ready-to-use and zero-dependency server and proxy that allows users to publish, read and proxy live video and audio streams through various protocols like RTSP, RTMP, HLS. It publish and read live streams to the server. It acts as a proxy and serve streams from other servers or cameras, always or on-demand.

audio streaming h264 video rtsp hls rtmp rtsp-server aac media-server rtmp-server rtp h265 obs-studio rtcp rtsp-relay rtmp-proxy rtsp-proxy video-streaming

janus-webrtc-gateway-docker - Perfect Docker Image for Media Streaming Expert User ( https://github

Dockerfile

This is a docker image for Janus Webrtc Gateway. Janus Gateway is still under active development phase. So, as the official docs says, some minor modification of the middleware library versions happens frequently. I try to deal with such a chage as much as I can. If you need any request about this repo, free to contact me. About the details of setup for this docker image, you should read the official docs https://janus.conf.meetecho.com/index.html carefully. I think that janus is better for webinar(web seminar), and jitsi is better for web conference system. The scalability of the current Jitsi Video Bridge(20181007) is poor because of having no local recording file(I'm not sure of this..). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHHoqKCjJ0E Jitsi last-n + VP8 simulcasting has the very good performance for web conference https://jitsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/nossdav2015lastn.pdf For the video format, janus recording is per video streaming, jitsi is for mixed video conference by using chrome headlesss + ffmpeg(alsa, libxcb). From these points, janus is suitable for webinar, jitsi is for web conference. Of course, both WebRTC SFU are amazing work!! I'm using both.